Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:CSM Guest Blog: "Reasonable Things" Voting Phase - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Singulis Pacifica, 13, 50, 34, 29, 73, 77, 80, 99, 48, 72, 24, 63, 59, 23, 21, 2, 26, 16, 68, 33, 90
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.08.05 15:51:00
|
2. Not QQ-ing on the matter, just disappointed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vesen Jouhinen wrote: You know its gonna be a QQ thread when that is in the title. Mmm, I suppose you need to actually read the post before you post. I am not complaining on the matter, it's just frustrating to see all the work you down th...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.07.24 02:17:00
|
3. Not QQ-ing on the matter, just disappointed. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've encountered this quite often in high-sec. I scan a new DED site and start to destroy the rats. Then when I'm about to enter the last section, someone enters, hurries to the next gate and grabs the target with the best loot. I understand it'...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.07.24 01:40:00
|
4. Tournament Brackets? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Veritas, the brackets are a major improvement compared to last year, a job well done, mate.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.07.20 20:33:00
|
5. [Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP Rise wrote: In this case, there is no option for Caldari or Amarr to counter balance, even if it was a different bay. This is what I don't understand Rise. I know you don't have the resources available (time, manpower, etc.) to impleme...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.06.24 22:16:00
|
6. [Odyssey 1.1] Tech 1 Industrials - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
TLDR: Good first step, but DST pilots feel left out and need to be included in the industrial overhaul. Solution to the 4 additional ones: add cargo hold specific indies for Gallente, use the Hoarder model to create three for Minmatar, and use on...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.06.22 20:31:00
|
7. This is unfair. You have cheated me, CCP :( - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Yay! Another Providence pilot. Or at least.. another in about three weeks or so. At any rate, can't have enough of us flying the sexiest ship in EVE. On a more serious note however, Zaryte. You'll find (and have found out already) that you will...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.06.05 13:17:00
|
8. Announcement:EVE Online: Odyssey Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This is an issue for the players that ship courier contracts around. Journal, contracts tab: Courier contracts that have been completed/delivered are still mentioned in the "In progress - accepted by" section. And that makes looking for the ones ...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.06.05 08:21:00
|
9. June 3rd, what skill are you going with? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Amarr Freighter V will still be a week out by then.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.05.23 08:10:00
|
10. Freighter changes?? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hey Jove Angel, As Nevyn Auscent and RaTTuS have pointed out, the upcoming change in freighter skill requirements is scheduled for release of Odyssey coming June 4. They also pointed out that there will be no refund. However, what I would like t...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.05.23 07:58:00
|
11. Issues connecting to TQ - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Seneca Aurun wrote: Yay!! Wait, so what exactly is the point of the launcher? We're supposed to get patches through it, but erhm. that is, if the launcher itself is patched correctly.
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.05.21 17:29:00
|
12. Question concerning sec rating for logistics pilots in low-sec. - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
I have a question concerning the most recent Crimewatch introduced in Retribution. If "Ganker A" attacks "Victim B" in low-sec and B is an unwarranted target to A. Then A becomes a criminal and his sec status drops. Now assume "Ambulance C" star...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.05.12 21:30:00
|
13. The new Tags system: Tag4Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: instead, he has to devote time to get his ISK up to get his status back. Yes, but he can also choose to avoid any time requirement by simply buying plex from CCP and covert that into ISK. What part of this do you not understand...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 15:51:00
|
14. RIP hisec mining, it was fun while it lasted. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Basil Pupkin wrote: I were able to find gravimetric sites before, now everyone is. How is that a buff again? Not to mention one simple point - 99% of hisec gravimetrics are plain useless even now, and buffed ores are not available in any of t...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 15:39:00
|
15. The new Tags system: Tag4Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: I understood it perfectly the first time, and it remains as incorrect as it was then. The penalty must still be paid. No ifs, no buts, no escape. Setting a market price to sec status is not a flaw GÇö it's a solution (and very mu...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 15:25:00
|
16. RIP hisec mining, it was fun while it lasted. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: That's not true at all. Stop being alarmist. Highsec miners will be just fine. Highsec ice miners stand to make pretty good profits. Actually, I think that with this change, regular High-Sec miners will get a boost a...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 15:08:00
|
17. The new Tags system: Tag4Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Oh, and the italicised part is 100% untrue. The penalty is still there and it must be paid. You're just given a choice how to pay it; you choose what kind of penalty you want to suffer. They've simply changed from a choice bet...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 14:56:00
|
18. The new Tags system: Tag4Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: The tag system does not remove any grinding or give people anything for free. Correct, taking on NPC's is still needed. Tippia wrote: All it does is decouple it from a specific time and place. You can now grind before y...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 14:46:00
|
19. The new Tags system: Tag4Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Darek Castigatus wrote: You're completely ignoring the flip side of the equasion - people who would pvp in lowsec occasinally but hate the harsh sec status losses and /or dont have the opportunities to grind sec back up. Tags 4 sec means thes...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 12:00:00
|
20. The new Tags system: Tag4Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm against this for a simple reason that this brings another variable into the game that has very little to do with the game itself: personal wealth. Suppose I am a rich high-sec suicide ganker: all I need to do is: gank, then buy a few plex, bu...
- by Singulis Pacifica - at 2013.04.27 11:39:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |